SPOILERS for Superman the movie 2025 ahead. DISCLAIMER: These are my exceedingly strong personal views and study of the Superman film, but I have nothing against anyone (including the film director), peoples or group(s) who love this movie.
DC Studios needed an overhaul for their on screen mythos of Superheroes and James Gunn, the director of the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy was the man they chose for this incredible task.
I had my hopes at 100% high that James Gunn was the right man for the job but as the dust settled in the theatre as the jaw dropping action packed movie ended, I face palmed in disappointment due to the sheer disrespect given to the lore of the Man of Steel. Gunn hadn’t saved the DCU, he brought a curse to it in my opinion.
The words of the Torah:
Numbers 24:9 New King James Version
“Blessed is he who blesses you (Israel), And cursed is he who curses you (Israel).”
James Gunn’s Political Stance
For example, James Gunn has once upon a time voiced his detest against Donald Trump with strong innuendo language.
So let’s peel the layers off this film to reveal the Radical Parabolic message of Superman 2025.
The parable of Boravia as Israel and Jarhanpur as Gaza
The movie centers on the conflict between the fictional nation of Boravia and Jarhanpur, with Boravia being the aggressor of superior firepower against the seemingly poor citizens of Jarhanpur who are only able to defend themselves with cement bricks and farming tools.
What nations do these two fictional countries above represent?
Anyone with a keen nose on current affairs may link them to Israel and Gaza!
The parable of Lex Luthor as Donald Trump
In fact, Lex Luthor (who is portrayed as a reflection President Donald Trump) was the mastermind behind the war of Boravia and Jarhanpur for the sole purpose of claiming his portion of the land after the takeover by Boravia.
Which suspiciously resembles what we read in the news this year:
The parable of the President of Boravia and a Prime Minister of Israel
with this look in Superman the movie 2025
(In office from 14 May 1948 – 26 January 1954)
Even if it was unintended, the resemblance of President Vasil Ghurkos of Boravia and someone of a Jewish look is practically undeniable. If I were to pick a Prime Minister of Israel that closely resembles Ghurkos, that would be none other than the legendary first Prime Minister of Israel, Ben Gurion.
You might accuse me of viewing this film from an antizionist view. Ok ok, how about everyone’s favorite Theoretical Physicist, Albert Einstein:
Wikipedia
Jewish men like Ben Gurion and Albert Einstein have a certain look to them and the President of Boravia uncannily resembles that look.
The Jewishness of Kal-El’s parents VS the un-Jewishness of Gunn’s Superman
Though a secular creation, Superman was created by two Jewish kids who grew up with a vision. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster penned and drew their creative aspiration with full force. All the ideas from their Jewish minds formed a child of Krypton, Kal-El, who was saved from genocide of his race by a self-destructing planet as his parents who loved and cherished him sent him far far away via a rocket ship to planet earth. Much like how Moses was saved by his mother from the genocidal Pharoah who commanded any male baby Hebrews to be slain.
My point is, respect the Jewishness of Superman’s origin.
Gunn’s Superman 2025 at first glance (minus any movies to retcon after this article in future) destroyed the Jewishness of Jor-El and Lara Von-El by two unforgivable edits:
- Kal-El learned that his parents didn’t send him to earth because they loved him and to save him as the only reason. They sent him to earth to be the strongest being on the planet, to take an harem and populate the earth with Kryptonians to subjugate the human race
- The word ‘Harem‘ is of Islamic/Arabic origins and not a Jewish practice
Superman cannot be held accountable for his actions
In the opening Act of the movie, we find Lois scoring an interview with Superman with Clark’s consent.
And she grills him like the good reporter she is.
Under Lois’ barrage of questions, we find out:
- That Superman intervened in a war outside of Metropolis – The war between Boravia and Jarhanpur. (Note that a war means there are two sides. If Jarhanpur was a parable of Gaza, there was no mention of a Hamas equivalent at all.)
- Superman flew the President of Boravia, Vasil Ghurkos out into the desert, pinned him to a cactus to interrogate him
- That Superman did all of this on his on Accord without any consultation with the authorities of the US government
He did all the above because he judged it was the right thing to do because, “people were dying.”
It’s worthwhile to note that Jarhanpur is portrayed as country of peasants lookalike and there was no mention of their government at all. If Jarhanpur was a reflection of Gaza, then where was the terrorist government Hamas in the movie?
At the end of the movie, Superman enlists the help of the Justice Gang to intervene before Boravia invaded Jarhanpur with ‘superior firepower’ and we witness Hawkgirl breaking into Ghurkos’ office to fly him out and drop him to his death.
James Gunn has repeatedly said that this movie is about humanity and yet at the end of the movie, but isn’t it more terrorist like to enter a nation, takeover with force and kill their President?
Superman and the Metahumans as the Mahdi
A recap of the evidence above:
- Superman’s parents advocating his dominion over earth and taking harems.
- Portrayal of Boravia as Israel and Jarhanpur as Gaza.
- Superman and Justice Gang both acting on their own authority to attack the President of Boravia and in the end, kill him.
I conclude that James Gunn’s Superman does not stand for Truth, Justice and the American way, human way or even a better tomorrow, instead, Gunn’s Superman has a closer resemblance to the Mahdi, the Messianic figure of radical Islam.
Putting the pieces of the message of James Gunn’s Superman together
If indeed Boravia represented Israel and Jarhanpur represented Gaza, I find many evidences of Superman the movie 2025 to be antithesis to the very values that the real Superman stood for.
I found having Kal-El’s parents being evil a great disrespect to the Superman lore I grew up loving. I hated the idea of Superman trying to solve a war outside of America just because he wanted to, and without a fair portrayal of two governments, but a one sided take on oppressor vs the people. Where was the Hamas equivalent? Shouldn’t Superman stop the terrorist government of Jarhanpur (Gaza) to save the people too? And I hate that for all that talk about the movie being for humanity, a President without Metahuman powers belonging to another nation was dropped to his death by the hands Metahuman ‘heroes’.
No one cared because the movie frames it’s heroes and villains for audiences. It was a political movie set to programme minds just like Barbie the movie.
Does anyone remember the agenda of Barbie the movie?
Superman the movie 2025 was a Marxist agenda to reform minds against an establishment while using the term – ‘Humanity’ as a front.
I love the comic book history of Superman but there are iterations of the character that I hate, All Star Superman was the first and now, Superman 2025 the movie.
I’m happy to be an outlier, I’m happy to share my thoughts and I’ll be happier if Truth and Justice are portrayed right in a Superman movie.